孙宇彤,李涛,李冰荷,王昊,吴震

• 1:交通运输部环境保护中心

摘要(Abstract)：

重型卡车是实现公路货运减排的关键环节。不同技术路径的生命周期碳减排效益差异显著，且单一路线难以适配多元化运输场景。本文系统梳理了新能源重卡的政策背景与发展趋势，从燃料周期、车辆全生命周期及综合货运网络三个层面，综述了主流技术路径的碳减排关键参数与作用机制，并结合典型场景分析了各路径的适用性。研究显示，燃料清洁化、动力系统升级、货运网络优化等是提升全生命周期减排的关键影响参数；完善补能基础设施可增强低碳技术的经济可替代性；结合运输场景与资源禀赋“因域定策”有利于重卡低碳转型落地应用。在此基础上，研究从关键技术标准、补能设施建设、精细化推广路径及需求侧政策激励四个方面提出了政策启示，以期为新能源重卡的低碳转型提供参考。

关键词(KeyWords)： 新能源重卡;生命周期;碳减排;技术路径;影响参数

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 孙宇彤,李涛,李冰荷,王昊,吴震

参考文献(References)：

• [1]吴晨旭,王新军,简丽,等.新能源重卡及补能设施发展趋势分析及推进对策研究[J].交通节能与环保, 2026, 22(1):44-48.
• [2]刘焕然,张妍,孙锌,等.中国重型货车全生命周期碳排放及减排潜力研究[J].中国汽车, 2022(7):45-52.
• [3]Zhang F, Obeid E, Bou Nader W, et al. Well-to-Wheel analysis of natural gas fuel for hybrid truck applications[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 240:114271.
• [4]Iyer R K, Kelly J C, Elgowainy A. Vehicle-cycle and life-cycle analysis of medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks in the United States[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2023, 891:164093.
• [5]凌波,朱广岩,王雯,等.不同技术路线重卡的生命周期碳排放、能耗及经济性效益分析[J].洁净煤技术, 2024, 30(S2):515-523.
• [6]徐圆圆,龚德鸿,黄正光,等.电动重卡替代柴油重卡的全生命周期碳减排效益分析[J].环境科学, 2024, 45(5):3119-3128.
• [7]黄小娱,谢明辉,李晓蔚,等.典型氢能产品生命周期评价和碳足迹比较[J].环境科学, 2024, 45(10):5641-5649.
• [8]Camacho M De Las N, Jurburg D, Tanco M. Hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty trucks:Review of main research topics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(68):29505-29525.
• [9]Zhu Z, Mu Z, Wei Y, et al. Experimental evaluation of performance of heavy-duty SI pure methanol engine with EGR[J]. Fuel, 2022, 325:124948.
• [10]宋志辉,何建祥,张志敏,等.面向商用车动力的甲醇发动机热效率提升路径与工程实践[J].内燃机工程, 2025, 46(5):52-61.
• [11]韩志玉.重卡低碳转型:混合动力与低碳燃料迭代发展[N].中国汽车报, 2025-04-22.
• [12]Chhugani T, Rahmani R. Full emissions and energy consumption life cycle assessment of different Heavy-Duty vehicles powered by Electricity, Hydrogen, Methanol, and LNG fuels produced from various sources[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2025, 326:119439.
• [13]Elagouz N, Tamim S, Alenazi A, et al. Life cycle sustainability assessment of alternative fuels for heavy-duty vehicles:a systematic review[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2026,31(4):55.
• [14]李雷,钱思达,徐黎庆,等.基于生命周期评价的氢能重卡排放分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(4):292.
• [15]中汽数据.商用车生命周期碳排放研究——以重型牵引车为例[N].中国汽车报, 2025-09-03.
• [16]Wang K, Zavaleta V G, Li Y, et al. Life-cycle CO2 mitigation of China’s class-8 heavy-duty trucks requires hybrid strategies[J]. One Earth, 2022, 5(6):709-723.
• [17]Zhao P, Zhang S, Santi P, et al. Challenges and opportunities in truck electrification revealed by big operational data[J]. Nature Energy,2024, 9(11):1427-1437.
• [18]Zhang S, Zhao P, Wang F, et al. Feasibility, cost and decarbonization potential of clean pathways for heavy-duty road transportation[J].Nature Reviews Clean Technology, 2025, 1(12):846-860.
• [19]Su J, Lin Q, Chen M. Optimizing carbon footprint in long-haul heavy-duty E-Truck transportation[J]. Nature Communications,2025, 16(1):9562.
• [20]赵效虎,刘鹤,李秀文,等.重型新能源商用车现状及发展趋势[J].重型汽车, 2026(2):41-42.
• [21]陈轲,薛露露.驶向2035:中国新能源重卡在区域与长途运输场景中的推广潜力研究[R].北京:世界资源研究所, 2025.
• [22]Tian M H, Yu-Jie Hu, Chengjiang Li, et al. The development pathway for hydrogen fuel cell heavy duty trucks in China:An energyenvironment-economy life cycle assessment approach[J]. Energy,2025, 322:135797.